Performance determined by?
Performance determined by?
I just upgraded to a usb 3.0 external drive in the hopes of speeding up my backup... However, it does not seem to have improved the speed. What is the limiting factor on speed of backup?
-
TeraByte Support
- Posts: 4105
- Joined: Thu May 05, 2011 10:37 pm
Re: Performance determined by?
You need to plug it in to a USB3 port (look at the symbol on the port) and
you need to use a USB3 cable (they are not the same as a USB2 cable).
You would also need to use Image for Linux or Image for Windows (or BIOS in
Image for DOS) to get USB3 speeds once you connect it properly.
"rubantin" wrote in message news:[email protected]...
I just upgraded to a usb 3.0 external drive in the hopes of speeding up my
backup... However, it does not seem to have improved the speed. What is the
limiting factor on speed of backup?
you need to use a USB3 cable (they are not the same as a USB2 cable).
You would also need to use Image for Linux or Image for Windows (or BIOS in
Image for DOS) to get USB3 speeds once you connect it properly.
"rubantin" wrote in message news:[email protected]...
I just upgraded to a usb 3.0 external drive in the hopes of speeding up my
backup... However, it does not seem to have improved the speed. What is the
limiting factor on speed of backup?
Re: Performance determined by?
rubantin,
Which Compression setting are you using? What is the size of the image? How long does it take to write the image? (Don't include Verify time or time before getting a PHYLock lock)
Which Compression setting are you using? What is the size of the image? How long does it take to write the image? (Don't include Verify time or time before getting a PHYLock lock)
Re: Performance determined by?
I am sure I have it in a usb 3.0 port
standard compression, used disk space to be backed up is 1.037GB, time to image is 22 hours,
standard compression, used disk space to be backed up is 1.037GB, time to image is 22 hours,
Re: Performance determined by?
I assume you mean 1,037 GB. That's a slow speed even by USB 2 standards.
Re: Performance determined by?
Try running ATTO on both USB HDs.
http://www.attotech.com/products/produc ... _Benchmark
You should get about 30 MB/sec RW on USB 2.0 and about 100 MB/sec RW on USB 3.0.
http://www.attotech.com/products/produc ... _Benchmark
You should get about 30 MB/sec RW on USB 2.0 and about 100 MB/sec RW on USB 3.0.
Re: Performance determined by?
thanks...
USB 3.0 Drive = 100.7 Write & 100.2 Read
USB 2.0 Drive = 22.7 Write & 22.7 Read
So, that's not the problem.... Any ideas why its so slow then?
USB 3.0 Drive = 100.7 Write & 100.2 Read
USB 2.0 Drive = 22.7 Write & 22.7 Read
So, that's not the problem.... Any ideas why its so slow then?
Re: Performance determined by?
ok.. turned validate off and getting a time of 8 hours 31 minutes on 3.0 drive and 14 hours for the 2.0...
strange thing though... the time remaining on the 2.0 was still climbing after 20 mins and was dropping faster than real time on the 3.0... so, the numbers aren't really that good.
strange thing though... the time remaining on the 2.0 was still climbing after 20 mins and was dropping faster than real time on the 3.0... so, the numbers aren't really that good.
Re: Performance determined by?
Try Enhanced Speed - A Compression. Use the USB 3.0 HD and let the image write complete. What is the image size and time?