I have been using IFL 3.64 to make images of Linux Mint - and sometimes Windows 10 or 11.
All versions of IFL 3.** have worked perfectly and been very useful.
I would have to pay to get IFL version 4.
There is a 50% discount offered - so twenty quid instead of forty.
I am not complaining about the cost.
But simply wondering whether I can stick to using 3.64 for the rest of my life.
For how long will 3.64 continue to work?
Do I really need to upgrade Image For Linux?
Re: Do I really need to upgrade Image For Linux?
I was wondering about the same... but my discount was 75% so I just bought upgrade. For now 3.64 version is as useful as 4.x, but as time passes, new bugs emerges and/or Microsoft changes things in Windows, the gap between new and old versions will be wider and wider. Not to mention of new features and security fixes.
Re: Do I really need to upgrade Image For Linux?
IFL 3.64 does not work with Secure Boot enabled.
Re: Do I really need to upgrade Image For Linux?
Thanks Fracso I tried it on a Windows 10 laptop with secure boot enabled in the UEFI BIOS and it would not boot IFL 3.64.
I have now bitten the bullet and paid £20.77 for IFL 4.01.
Now to see if that works on the aforementioned laptop.
Fingers crossed!
I have now bitten the bullet and paid £20.77 for IFL 4.01.
Now to see if that works on the aforementioned laptop.
Fingers crossed!
Re: Do I really need to upgrade Image For Linux?
And it did work. Excellent!
NB makedisk.exe works using HIRENSBOOTCD if there isn't a Windows machine available.
NB makedisk.exe works using HIRENSBOOTCD if there isn't a Windows machine available.