On Mon, 7 May 2012 10:34:48 PDT, DrTeeth wrote:
>On Sun, 6 May 2012 13:56:22 PDT, just as I was about to take a herb,
>Brian K disturbed my reverie and wrote:
>
>>You don't like the idea of junction points? Your Games folder would be in another partition but would still "appear" to be in the C: drive even though the C: drive data would be 126 GB smaller.
>
>That's a great idea, I'll look into it. Would be still easier if TBU
>could code something
.
Using junction points is useful for folders which cannot be easily
referenced when they are on another drive, but surely your games can
be installed to the drive and folder of your choice? Wouldn't junction
points be an unnecessary complication in this case?
A I understand it, the 'special' code in the imaging products to
'omit' the page and hibernation files does not in fact do this.
Rather, the files are included as normal but with their contents
replaced with all zeros so that the compression algorithm will reduce
them down to an insignificant size in the image.
On restore, these files would be re-created as they were in the same
locations, but with content of zero, which doesn't matter with these
files as they will be initialised by Windows when next used. Is this
what you want to happen with your games files and folders?
Just some thoughts.