Bob Coleman wrote:
> jbraner,
>
> Yes, even before reading your latest post, I had realized that I needed to
> come back and say the following which is exactly what I would have said
> absent your last post.
>
> I said above that BIBM won't work on a UEFI system. That's not quite
> correct. If the system is booting in legacy mode and the operating systems
> to be booted are on a(n) (E)MBR disk, it will work. That's exactly my
> current situation. What I think I should have said is that if the
> "UEFI/BIOS" (not a precisely correct term either) doesn't support
> legacy booting or legacy booting is not enabled, then BIBM won't work,
> probably won't even boot.
Hi Bob,
I think I finally get it now.
I also think that we have all shown that this is *not* a straightforward topic
I didn't help matters by trying to add a little sarcasm/humour in to the mix, and saying GPT when I meant MBR.
> If the system is booting in legacy mode and the operating systems
> to be booted are on a(n) (E)MBR disk, it will work. That's exactly my
> current situation.
That is exactly my situation too.
CyberSimian,
Yes - I think we're all converging (and agreeing) now
also, having read the TeraByte site again - I think BIU does also work with your example #1 (but don't take my word for it)
So - it sounds like staying with BIBM is a good plan until we get a new PC that will not work with "legacy" (E)MBR disks.
Mind you - look at the product info for BIBM and BootIt UEFI - they are *very* similar. I guess it would be the UEFI "BIOS" (or whatever w e agree to call it) on the new PC that would dictate the need for us to change. It also looks like either product would be able to change our (E)MBR disks to GPT - so the changeover *should* be relatively painless (cough).
We would obviously have a bunch of backups handy before trying any of this...