I decided to use IFL 292 from SD card to image my laptop.
It took about 10-11 minutes with B-F-B validation.
It took close to an hour using IFW 292.
Image was to the same USB 3 HD.
Mary
IFL 2.92 was FAST
Re: IFL 2.92 was FAST
Mary,
What is the size of the image? Are both images the same size?
How much data is in the partition being backed up?
Did you use the same compression for IFW and IFL?
What is the size of the image? Are both images the same size?
How much data is in the partition being backed up?
Did you use the same compression for IFW and IFL?
-
- Posts: 785
- Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2011 1:24 am
Re: IFL 2.92 was FAST
They were made 1 day apart on a 58 GB, 28 GB data mostly not MP4 or MP3
that are already compressed, with standard compression. I made no
changes in either program re defaults.
I was surprised myself.
Mary
On 11/12/2014 9:52 PM, "Brian K" wrote:
> Mary,
>
> What is the size of the image? Are both images the same size?
> How much data is in the partition being backed up?
> Did you use the same compression for IFW and IFL?
>
>
that are already compressed, with standard compression. I made no
changes in either program re defaults.
I was surprised myself.
Mary
On 11/12/2014 9:52 PM, "Brian K" wrote:
> Mary,
>
> What is the size of the image? Are both images the same size?
> How much data is in the partition being backed up?
> Did you use the same compression for IFW and IFL?
>
>
Re: IFL 2.92 was FAST
Thanks Mary. That IFW time is extremely slow. Any chance you could repeat the IFW image?