What does byte-for-byte validation

[Brian K]

DrTeeth wrote:

> Think we can all agree that BfB is better, but by how much? Is the extra benefit
> worth the extra time it takes?


Good question.

[TeraByte Support]

I think that would be a personal preference to determine if it's worth the
time. B4B catch more areas as the article indicates.

"DrTeeth" wrote in message news:8323@public.image...

TeraByte Support wrote:
> covered in

[
http://www.terabyteunlimited.com/kb/article.php?id=350
](http://www.terabyteunlimited.com/kb/article.php?id=350)

That article covers the differences between the two validation protocols,
but does not quantify how much 'better' one is than the other. I am not sure
it is possible to provide it, but this information is what is needed to help
users decide which one to use.

Think we can all agree that BfB is better, but by how much? Is the extra
benefit worth the extra time it takes?

TIA,

DrT

[DrTeeth]

On Thu, 10 Jul 2014 19:39:03 PDT, just as I was about to take a herb,
"TeraByte Support" disturbed my
reverie and wrote:

>I think that would be a personal preference to determine if it's worth the
>time.

To make a logical decision on that issue one needs quantifiable data.
Otherwise it is like choosing a hard drive because the name sounds
'better' rather than looking sat hard data.
--
Cheers,

DrT

** You've never known happiness until you're married;
** but by then it is too late.