Page 1 of 1

Imaging speed

Posted: Sun May 26, 2013 7:21 pm
by borate
The SSD drive images the alternate SATA drive's Windows 8 18.8G partition in about 28'.
The SATA drive images the alternate SSD drive's Windows 7 16.2G partition in about 14'.

Do those write times seem logical to other users?

Re: Imaging speed

Posted: Mon May 27, 2013 6:07 am
by TeraByte Support(PP)
Are those sizes the final image (TBI) file sizes, the used space, or the actual sizes of the partitions?

Is the destination drive the same for both backups? What type of drive is it?

Are you using the same backup options for both backups (same compression, for example)?

Re: Imaging speed

Posted: Mon May 27, 2013 6:27 am
by Brian K
borate wrote:
>
> Do those write times seem logical to other users?

Not if 28" means 28 seconds. Can you post the IFW.LOG entry?

Re: Imaging speed

Posted: Mon May 27, 2013 2:13 pm
by borate
TeraByte Support(PP) wrote:
> Are those sizes the final image (TBI) file sizes, the used space...

Yes, as shown in PROPERTIES in File Explorer.

> Is the destination drive the same for both backups? What type of drive is it?

Yes, it's the SATA...the drive that houses W7.

Description Local Fixed Disk
Compressed No
File System NTFS
Size 54.56 GB (58,587,082,752 bytes)

> Are you using the same backup options for both backups (same compression, for example)?

Precisely, and the same version of IFW.

Re: Imaging speed

Posted: Mon May 27, 2013 2:21 pm
by borate
Brian K wrote:
> borate wrote:
> >
> > Do those write times seem logical to other users?
>
> Not if 28" means 28 seconds.

I only wish. ^_^

Can you post the IFW.LOG entry?

YOUR wish is my command. W7 (resides on the SSD) Imaging was run from and backed up to the SATA disk (16.2G in about 14'.)

[5/26/2013 7:23:02 AM] Image for Windows 2.82 (GUI)
[5/26/2013 7:23:02 AM] Starting Update:
imagew.exe /b /d:w0@0x2 /f:"D:\IFW\W7_64_P" /v /
[5/26/2013 7:23:02 AM] Deleting D:\IFW\W7_64_P.TBI
[5/26/2013 7:23:02 AM] PHYLock is waiting for drive writing to stop ...
[5/26/2013 7:23:07 AM] PHYLock using drive J:
[5/26/2013 7:23:07 AM] PHYLock Started
[5/26/2013 7:23:07 AM] PHYLock Using Disk
[5/26/2013 7:23:07 AM] PHYLock version 10
[5/26/2013 7:23:07 AM] Backup: Drive 0 (J:) MBR 1 Partition (02) 114371 MiB HPFS/NTFS
[5/26/2013 7:23:07 AM] To: D:\IFW\W7_64_P.TBI
[5/26/2013 7:30:15 AM] INFO: Total Sectors:234231808 Total Allocated:89118896
[5/26/2013 7:30:15 AM] INFO: 59876592 Sector(s) backed up
[5/26/2013 7:30:15 AM] Validating: MBR 1 Partition (02) 114371 MiB HPFS/NTFS
[5/26/2013 7:30:15 AM] From: D:\IFW\W7_64_P.TBI
[5/26/2013 7:37:09 AM] Operation Completed with Error Code 0
[5/26/2013 7:37:09 AM] Stop

And here is W8 (resides on the SATA). Imaging was run from the SSD and backed up to the same SATA as above. 18.8G in about 28'.
(One might think that imaging from the SSD would be faster than that from the SATA. (The W8 file is larger, however.)

[4/29/2013 1:17:30 PM] Image for Windows 2.81 (GUI)
[4/29/2013 1:17:30 PM] Starting Update:
imagew.exe /b /d:w1@0x1 /f:"K:\IFW\W8_RTM_H" /v /
[4/29/2013 1:17:30 PM] Deleting K:\IFW\W8_RTM_H.TBI
[4/29/2013 1:17:30 PM] PHYLock is waiting for drive writing to stop ...
[4/29/2013 1:17:35 PM] PHYLock using drive J:
[4/29/2013 1:17:36 PM] PHYLock Started
[4/29/2013 1:17:36 PM] PHYLock Using Disk
[4/29/2013 1:17:36 PM] PHYLock version 10
[4/29/2013 1:17:36 PM] Backup: Drive 1 (J:) MBR 0 Partition (01) 58596 MiB HPFS/NTFS
[4/29/2013 1:17:36 PM] To: K:\IFW\W8_RTM_H.TBI
[4/29/2013 1:38:13 PM] INFO: Total Sectors:120005487 Total Allocated:78705608
[4/29/2013 1:38:13 PM] INFO: 62847336 Sector(s) backed up
[4/29/2013 1:38:14 PM] Validating: MBR 0 Partition (01) 58596 MiB HPFS/NTFS
[4/29/2013 1:38:14 PM] From: K:\IFW\W8_RTM_H.TBI
[4/29/2013 1:45:38 PM] Operation Completed with Error Code 0
[4/29/2013 1:45:38 PM] Stop

Re: Imaging speed

Posted: Mon May 27, 2013 4:18 pm
by TeraByte Support
?????? missing the command line showing the options (if you had a password,
you could just block that out) and you're showing one doing a backup and one
doing a restore (writing is slower than reading).



"borate" wrote in message news:[email protected]...

Brian K wrote:
> borate wrote:
> >
> > Do those write times seem logical to other users?
>
> Not if 28" means 28 seconds.

I only wish. ^_^

Can you post the IFW.LOG entry?

YOUR wish is my command. W7 (resides on the SSD) Imaging was run from and
backed up to the SATA disk (16.2G in about 14".)

[5/26/2013 7:23:02 AM] Image for Windows 2.82 (GUI)
[5/26/2013 7:23:02 AM] Starting Update
[5/26/2013 7:23:02 AM] Deleting D:\IFW\W7_64_P.TBI
[5/26/2013 7:23:02 AM] PHYLock is waiting for drive writing to stop ...
[5/26/2013 7:23:07 AM] PHYLock using drive J:
[5/26/2013 7:23:07 AM] PHYLock Started
[5/26/2013 7:23:07 AM] PHYLock Using Disk
[5/26/2013 7:23:07 AM] PHYLock version 10
[5/26/2013 7:23:07 AM] Backup: Drive 0 (J:) MBR 1 Partition (02) 114371 MiB
HPFS/NTFS
[5/26/2013 7:23:07 AM] To: D:\IFW\W7_64_P.TBI
[5/26/2013 7:30:15 AM] INFO: Total Sectors:234231808 Total
Allocated:89118896
[5/26/2013 7:30:15 AM] INFO: 59876592 Sector(s) backed up
[5/26/2013 7:30:15 AM] Validating: MBR 1 Partition (02) 114371 MiB HPFS/NTFS
[5/26/2013 7:30:15 AM] From: D:\IFW\W7_64_P.TBI
[5/26/2013 7:37:09 AM] Operation Completed with Error Code 0
[5/26/2013 7:37:09 AM] Stop

And here is W8 (resides on the SATA). Imaging was run from the SSD and
backed up to the same SATA as above. 18.8G in about 28".
(One might think that imaging from the SSD would be faster than that from
the SATA. (The W8 file is larger, however.)

[4/30/2013 10:38:52 AM] Image for Windows 2.81 (GUI)
[4/30/2013 10:38:52 AM] Starting Update
[4/30/2013 10:38:52 AM] Restoring: MBR 0 Partition (01) 58596 MiB HPFS/NTFS
[4/30/2013 10:38:52 AM] To: Drive 1 (J:) MBR 0 Partition (01) 58596 MiB
HPFS/NTFS
[4/30/2013 10:38:52 AM] From: K:\IFW\W8_RTM_H.TBI
[4/30/2013 10:59:19 AM] Operation Completed with Error Code 0
[4/30/2013 10:59:19 AM] Stop


Re: Imaging speed

Posted: Tue May 28, 2013 1:19 am
by Brian K
° ' "
degrees minutes seconds

Re: Imaging speed

Posted: Tue May 28, 2013 3:14 pm
by borate
TeraByte Support wrote:
> ?????? missing the command line showing the options (if you had a password, you could just block that out) and you're showing one doing a backup and one doing a restore (writing is slower than reading).

Updated and corrected in my 5/27 7:21 post. Thanks.

Re: Imaging speed

Posted: Tue May 28, 2013 3:26 pm
by borate
Brian K wrote:
> ° ' "
> degrees minutes seconds

Thanks Brian. A mind is a terrible thing to lose.^