TeraByte Support wrote:
> For the moment the only advantages of Disk Utility over IFL are
> 1. the ability to write in HFS+ partition
>
> > You can write to HFS+ partition, just mount it from the boot disk. and
> use
> > File (OS).
I did not know that you added support for hfs+ mounting. Only for IFL or IFD and IFW too?
> 2. the recovery partition that you can access during boot time (no need for
>
> external media start the image)
>
> > You can setup a partition to boot Linux and run IFL. Of course it
> doesn't
> > do much good if your HD dies.
True. Does IFL support UEFI for booting. If yes one could use the "bless" command to boot directly from the iso without the need to create and extra partition
> 3. IFL does not support yet Apple's hybrid mbr.
>
> > It would backup fine since it would access the GPT (they should be
> > entering the partition in the GPT as well as MBR), it also puts back the
>
> > MBR entries I believe.
They do.
Cool. Any chance to see bootit bm mac and Uefi compatible in the future?
Feature request: omit folders
-
TeraByte Support
- Posts: 3613
- Joined: Thu May 05, 2011 10:37 pm
Re: Feature request: omit folders
Just the linux boot disk for file writing to HFS+ (windows could do it if
you had a driver to support it).
The IFL boot disk isn't UEFI, it's standard, but you can use IFL on a linux
boot disk you set up.
....
"Panagiotis" wrote in message news:3496@public.image...
TeraByte Support wrote:
> For the moment the only advantages of Disk Utility over IFL are
> 1. the ability to write in HFS+ partition
>
> > You can write to HFS+ partition, just mount it from the boot disk. and
> use
> > File (OS).
I did not know that you added support for hfs+ mounting. Only for IFL or IFD
and IFW too?
> 2. the recovery partition that you can access during boot time (no need
> for
>
> external media start the image)
>
> > You can setup a partition to boot Linux and run IFL. Of course it
> doesn't
> > do much good if your HD dies.
True. Does IFL support UEFI for booting. If yes one could use the "bless"
command to boot directly from the iso without the need to create and extra
partition
> 3. IFL does not support yet Apple's hybrid mbr.
>
> > It would backup fine since it would access the GPT (they should be
> > entering the partition in the GPT as well as MBR), it also puts back the
>
> > MBR entries I believe.
They do.
Cool. Any chance to see bootit bm mac and Uefi compatible in the future?
you had a driver to support it).
The IFL boot disk isn't UEFI, it's standard, but you can use IFL on a linux
boot disk you set up.
....
"Panagiotis" wrote in message news:3496@public.image...
TeraByte Support wrote:
> For the moment the only advantages of Disk Utility over IFL are
> 1. the ability to write in HFS+ partition
>
> > You can write to HFS+ partition, just mount it from the boot disk. and
> use
> > File (OS).
I did not know that you added support for hfs+ mounting. Only for IFL or IFD
and IFW too?
> 2. the recovery partition that you can access during boot time (no need
> for
>
> external media start the image)
>
> > You can setup a partition to boot Linux and run IFL. Of course it
> doesn't
> > do much good if your HD dies.
True. Does IFL support UEFI for booting. If yes one could use the "bless"
command to boot directly from the iso without the need to create and extra
partition
> 3. IFL does not support yet Apple's hybrid mbr.
>
> > It would backup fine since it would access the GPT (they should be
> > entering the partition in the GPT as well as MBR), it also puts back the
>
> > MBR entries I believe.
They do.
Cool. Any chance to see bootit bm mac and Uefi compatible in the future?