3 hour vs 40 minute image

User discussion and information resource forum for Image products.
Post Reply
hime3
Posts: 60
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2012 5:47 pm

3 hour vs 40 minute image

Post by hime3 »

v3.20 Win10 image today required more than 3 hours vs usual 40 or less minutes for previous routine images.
RAM cache 8192.
Disk cach 4095.
Any suggestion the issue and remedy?
hime
TeraByte Support
Posts: 3598
Joined: Thu May 05, 2011 10:37 pm

Re: 3 hour vs 40 minute image

Post by TeraByte Support »

look at the log to see if there was a difference in the amount of data
backed up, etc..

Also if something was heavily using the disk drive (defragging, indexing,
etc..), it can slow it down.


"hime3" wrote in message news:15272@public.image...

v3.20 Win10 image today required more than 3 hours vs usual 40 or less
minutes for previous routine images.
RAM cache 8192.
Disk cach 4095.
Any suggestion the issue and remedy?
hime

DrTeeth
Posts: 1289
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2011 6:58 pm

Re: 3 hour vs 40 minute image

Post by DrTeeth »

On Wed, 11 Jul 2018 23:13:01 EDT, just as I was about to take a herb,
"TeraByte Support" disturbed my
reverie and wrote:

>Also if something was heavily using the disk drive (defragging, indexing,
>etc..), it can slow it down.

PMFJI, if I leave a program running (BOINC in my case) that makes
read/writes to the drive, the backup will start, but invariably fail
with an advisory to increase the memory used for PHYLock.
--
Cheers,

DrT

"If you want to find out what is wrong
with democracy, spend five minutes with
the average voter." - Winston Churchill
Post Reply