3 hour vs 40 minute image

User discussion and information resource forum for Image products.

3 hour vs 40 minute image

Postby hime3 » Wed Jul 11, 2018 1:42 pm

v3.20 Win10 image today required more than 3 hours vs usual 40 or less minutes for previous routine images.
RAM cache 8192.
Disk cach 4095.
Any suggestion the issue and remedy?
hime
hime3
 
Posts: 51
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2012 10:47 am

Re: 3 hour vs 40 minute image

Postby TeraByte Support » Wed Jul 11, 2018 8:13 pm

look at the log to see if there was a difference in the amount of data
backed up, etc..

Also if something was heavily using the disk drive (defragging, indexing,
etc..), it can slow it down.


"hime3" wrote in message news:15272@public.image...

v3.20 Win10 image today required more than 3 hours vs usual 40 or less
minutes for previous routine images.
RAM cache 8192.
Disk cach 4095.
Any suggestion the issue and remedy?
hime

TeraByte Support
 
Posts: 2514
Joined: Thu May 05, 2011 3:37 pm

Re: 3 hour vs 40 minute image

Postby DrTeeth » Thu Jul 12, 2018 3:38 am

On Wed, 11 Jul 2018 23:13:01 EDT, just as I was about to take a herb,
"TeraByte Support" disturbed my
reverie and wrote:

>Also if something was heavily using the disk drive (defragging, indexing,
>etc..), it can slow it down.

PMFJI, if I leave a program running (BOINC in my case) that makes
read/writes to the drive, the backup will start, but invariably fail
with an advisory to increase the memory used for PHYLock.
--
Cheers,

DrT

"If you want to find out what is wrong
with democracy, spend five minutes with
the average voter." - Winston Churchill
DrTeeth
 
Posts: 1089
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2011 11:58 am


Return to Image for DOS/Linux/Windows