BackBox 3.09

User discussion forum for items related to technology in general.

BackBox 3.09

Postby Liam » Mon Dec 23, 2013 1:42 pm

Hi, has anyone ever come across BackBox? I was happily playing with Solaris 10, Windows 7, FreeBSD 9.2 and Windows XP, when I decided to try THIS one. Even after deleting everything and starting again, including updating to the brand new BIBM 1.23, it just keeps overwriting everything.
Liam
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon Dec 23, 2013 1:21 pm

Re: BackBox 3.09

Postby TeraByte Support » Mon Dec 23, 2013 3:21 pm

I would presume you'd just uninstall it?
TeraByte Support
 
Posts: 2313
Joined: Thu May 05, 2011 3:37 pm

Re: BackBox 3.09

Postby Liam » Fri Dec 27, 2013 9:51 am

Hi, I have moved on to Kali Linux 1.0.5. I can install either Kali OR Solaris 10, and boot it from Bootit BM, but whenever I install the other OS, I need to re-install Bootit BM and neither partition is bootable. Any ideas?
Liam
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon Dec 23, 2013 1:21 pm

Re: BackBox 3.09

Postby DrTeeth » Fri Dec 27, 2013 10:02 am

On Fri, 27 Dec 2013 08:51:40 PST, just as I was about to take a herb,
Liam disturbed my reverie and wrote:

>Any ideas?

1) Some distros will not allow the boot loader to be placed in a
partition, only the drive's MBR (e.g Fedora)

2) Some distros necessitate the reinstall of BIBM even though the boot
loader has been installed into the OS partition (e.g. openSUSE).

3) Try not just hiding partitions, but try delting them from the EMBR
before installing.

I have loads of distros installed across my 6 PCs and only have probs,
if not paying attention, with MSoft viruses, aka OSs.
--

Cheers,

DrT

** Stress - the condition brought about by having to
** resist the temptation to beat the living daylights
** out of someone who richly deserves it.
DrTeeth
 
Posts: 970
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2011 11:58 am

Re: BackBox 3.09

Postby TeraByte Support » Fri Dec 27, 2013 10:13 am

You need to install the kernel loader to the partition where it should be
instead of the mbr.

"Liam" wrote in message news:7113@public.tech.misc...

Hi, I have moved on to Kali Linux 1.0.5. I can install either Kali OR
Solaris 10, and boot it from Bootit BM, but whenever I install the other OS,
I need to re-install Bootit BM and neither partition is bootable. Any ideas?

TeraByte Support
 
Posts: 2313
Joined: Thu May 05, 2011 3:37 pm

Re: BackBox 3.09

Postby DrTeeth » Fri Dec 27, 2013 1:28 pm

On Fri, 27 Dec 2013 09:13:50 PST, just as I was about to take a herb,
"TeraByte Support" disturbed my
reverie and wrote:

>You need to install the kernel loader to the partition where it should be
>instead of the mbr.

These days, some installers do not allow one to do that. For e.g.
Fedora and Manjaro (0.8.8).
--

Cheers,

DrT

** Stress - the condition brought about by having to
** resist the temptation to beat the living daylights
** out of someone who richly deserves it.
DrTeeth
 
Posts: 970
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2011 11:58 am

Re: BackBox 3.09 / FreeBSD

Postby Liam » Sat Dec 28, 2013 8:31 am

Hi, thanks very much for the replies.
I don't know if I should open a new post now, or what.
My current situation is that I made each O/S visible to the other one, and I now have Solaris 10 and Kali Linux (which I used LILO for, instead of Grub) both running. However, when I try to install FreeBSD 9.2, by a process which worked when it was the first O/S to be installed, I can't get past the partitioning. It says the device doesn't support it. I am using a Panasonic CF-18 laptop and a suitable USB CDROM. Have I hit a hardware problem? Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
Liam
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon Dec 23, 2013 1:21 pm

Re: BackBox 3.09

Postby Liam » Sat Dec 28, 2013 9:17 am

Cancel that! I hid the other O/Ss and it's worked. Does that make sense?
Liam
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon Dec 23, 2013 1:21 pm

Re: BackBox 3.09

Postby Liam » Sat Dec 28, 2013 9:48 am

I know I'm getting carried away, now, but has anyone ever installed Plan9 with a USB CDROM?
Liam
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon Dec 23, 2013 1:21 pm

Re: BackBox 3.09

Postby Liam » Sat Dec 28, 2013 3:15 pm

Nope, no good.
After reading an outdated post about FreeBSD, and trying to carry out the info before stumbling across newer stuff and deciding to get rid of the obsolete business..... here I go again. What is going on? I'm glad you don't PAY for this stuff!
Liam
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon Dec 23, 2013 1:21 pm


Return to Technology

cron