Page 1 of 1
Phylock is slow
Posted: Wed May 11, 2016 11:53 pm
by mjnelson99
Does having VSS active slow down/speed up Phylock? AV & Thunderbird is
about all that is running.
I restarted IFW 2.99 at almost 5 minutes. I know it used to take less
time to start.
Thanks
Mary
Re: Phylock is slow
Posted: Thu May 12, 2016 3:22 am
by TeraByte Support
doesn't affect it.
"MJNelson" wrote in message news:11491@public.image...
Does having VSS active slow down/speed up Phylock? AV & Thunderbird is
about all that is running.
I restarted IFW 2.99 at almost 5 minutes. I know it used to take less
time to start.
Thanks
Mary
Re: Phylock is slow
Posted: Thu May 12, 2016 7:08 pm
by Bob Coleman
This could be completely coincidental with no relevance at all, but I noticed that PhyLock took an unusually long time to start yesterday (May 11). I had booted the PC shortly before starting the backup. I suspect, but certainly don't know, that the Windows 10 update which was installed when I shut down the PC last night was being downloaded while PhyLock was waiting.
Re: Phylock is slow
Posted: Thu May 12, 2016 9:39 pm
by mjnelson99
I don't think I have downloaded Win 10, even accidentally.
On 5/12/2016 2:08 PM, Bob Coleman wrote:
> This could be completely coincidental with no relevance at all,
but I noticed that PhyLock took an unusually long time to start
yesterday (May 11). I had booted the PC shortly before starting
the backup. I suspect, but certainly don't know, that the Windows 10
update which was installed when I shut down the PC last night was being
downloaded while PhyLock was waiting.
>
>
Re: Phylock is slow
Posted: Fri May 13, 2016 7:08 pm
by Bob Coleman
I'm running Win 10 and was speculating that the monthly patches may have been downloading. If you're not running Win 10, my comment was irrelevant for sure.
Re: Phylock is slow
Posted: Sat May 14, 2016 1:51 am
by mjnelson99
Tonight I am running IFW 2.99 It had started running @ 1.32 minutes. Not
sure exactly what time. That is more like it.
On 5/13/2016 2:08 PM, Bob Coleman wrote:
> I'm running Win 10 and was speculating that the monthly patches may have been downloading. If you're not running Win 10, my comment was irrelevant for sure.
>
>