Page 1 of 1
Question on IFW COPY option
Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2016 3:51 am
by tas3086
In many places online, you recommend not to copy,as not supported, the active OS partition to another drive location. You suggest creating a backup file, then restoring the backup file to another drive location.
Assuming that "to another drive location" implies another physical drive, Is there really a difference? Isn't backing up the active OS partition just as likely to cause the same problem?
If there is a difference, can you explain, as I have been using copy for a long time without apparent problems.
Re: Question on IFW COPY option
Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2016 1:37 pm
by mjnelson99
It may be better to do a copy from a bootable device so Windows is not
running.
I have IFL and can boot from that.
Mary
On 4/19/2016 10:51 PM, tas3086 wrote:
> In many places online, you recommend not to copy,as not supported,
the active OS partition to another drive location.
You suggest creating a backup file, then restoring the backup file to
another drive location.
>
> Assuming that "to another drive location" implies another physical
drive, Is there really a difference? Isn't backing up the active OS
partition just as likely to cause the same problem?
>
> If there is a difference, can you explain, as I have been using
copy for a long time without apparent problems.
>
>
Re: Question on IFW COPY option
Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2016 4:09 pm
by TeraByte Support
that's probably more likely talking about linux, don't backup or copy a
mounted partition unless mounted read-only.
Doing a backup and restoring wouldn't be much different, but backup allows
you to have more copies where as a copy if fails in the middle means the
target is not considered good and if you don't have another one, you don't
have anything.
"tas3086" wrote in message news:11408@public.image...
In many places online, you recommend not to copy,as not supported, the
active OS partition to another drive location. You suggest creating a
backup file, then restoring the backup file to another drive location.
Assuming that "to another drive location" implies another physical drive, Is
there really a difference? Isn't backing up the active OS partition just as
likely to cause the same problem?
If there is a difference, can you explain, as I have been using copy for a
long time without apparent problems.
Re: Question on IFW COPY option
Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2016 8:55 pm
by Brian K
I use image/restore when transferring an OS to another HD/SSD. I'm often asked about using "Copy" in a laptop situation where the user wants to copy the OS to a new HD/SSD in a USB enclosure, prior to swapping drives. I gather a Geometry setting should be used but I've never understood what it does or which Geometry setting to select. Can we make this crystal clear so I can answer future questions without feeling uncomfortable?
Re: Question on IFW COPY option
Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2016 8:59 pm
by TeraByte Support
just enable the global option to assume same target system.
"Brian K" wrote in message news:11416@public.image...
I use image/restore when transferring an OS to another HD/SSD. I'm often
asked about using "Copy" in a laptop situation where the user wants to copy
the OS to a new HD/SSD in a USB enclosure, prior to swapping drives. I
gather a Geometry setting should be used but I've never understood what it
does or which Geometry setting to select. Can we make this crystal clear so
I can answer future questions without feeling uncomfortable?
Re: Question on IFW COPY option
Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2016 9:17 pm
by Brian K
Thanks. I don't understand what that setting does but it's an easy one to remember. Are the geometry settings in LBA-0?
Re: Question on IFW COPY option
Posted: Thu Apr 21, 2016 11:39 pm
by TeraByte Support
they are used by some (typically older) OS boot/kernel loaders (a bios
method for accessing the drive).
"Brian K" wrote in message news:11420@public.image...
Thanks. I don't understand what that setting does but it's an easy one to
remember. Are the geometry settings in LBA-0?